Skip to content
Satnam SatoshiIn service of humanityFind your place ↗
Menu
The practice lab / Curiosity in action

Try. Tinker.
“Oh, now I get it.”

Four small experiments for the ideas that matter. Make a choice and see what changes. No timers, no grades, no real funds.

Buttons need JavaScript. Worked examples below remain readable without it. Nothing is sent to a server, stored or connected to a wallet.

01 / Foundations / Count in small units

The satoshi challenge

One BTC = 100,000,000 sats. Multiply the BTC quantity by 100 million. This is a unit conversion, not a market price.

See a worked example

0.001 BTC × 100,000,000 = 100,000 sats. Changing the unit does not change the amount you have.

02 / Deep dive / Follow every sat

Where does the change go?

Make a fictional 7,000-sat payment with a fixed 500-sat classroom fee. Select whole inputs below. Any remainder becomes a change output in this simplified model.

See the balanced example

6,000 + 2,000 = 8,000 sats in. Then 7,000 to the recipient + 500 change + 500 fee = 8,000. Change is a new output, not an unused piece of an old input.

Illustration only. Real fees depend on transaction weight and fee rate; input choice affects privacy and fees. This model does not build transactions, apply dust rules or recommend coin selection.

03 / Sovereignty / Independence by design

The 2-of-3 signing room

Imagine a policy that requires two distinct valid signatures from three keys. Select fictional signers and watch the threshold. Then remove one and ask what recovery would require.

See the three combinations

A + B, A + C, or B + C can meet the threshold, assuming valid signatures under the actual policy. A single key cannot. Two copies of the same key do not count as two different signers.

No keys are generated. A satisfied signing threshold does not establish permission from people, safe backups or independent devices. Recovery design needs more than this counting model.

04 / Everyday habits / Pause before trust

Would you stop here?

Read the fictional situation. Decide whether it calls for stopping or continuing your checks. “Keep checking” never means “send money.”

Read a sample situation

Someone calling themselves support asks for recovery words. Stop: those words can provide spending control. Never share them with a helper, a website or an AI.

Take the “aha” back to a lesson.

These tiny models leave out real-world complexity on purpose. Follow the linked lesson and primary sources to understand the limits. New lab references checked October 5, 2026.

Teach it to someone else.

Explain where change comes from, why key independence matters, or what made a request suspicious. A clear explanation is worth more than a lucky guess.

Visit the community open table →

AI-assisted classroom exercises, not financial advice, a wallet, certification or a guarantee of safety.